This is Part Three of a three part series on wildfires and economic damages. To navigate back to Part One, please click here, or to read Part Two, please click here.
When devastating wildfires sweep through communities, leaving behind a trail of destruction and displaced lives, the immediate response focuses on safety and containment. However, once the immediate danger has passed, a different kind of challenge emerges—one that can stretch on for years and prove equally daunting: the complex process of resolving claims and compensating victims.
This final phase of wildfire recovery requires specialized expertise to navigate the intricate web of legal, financial, and technical considerations that determine how victims and communities rebuild and move forward.
The Foundation of Claim Resolution Structures
Wildfires caused by negligence of third parties frequently give rise to the creation of a mechanism whereby the victims can be compensated other than through litigation, similar to other mass tort resolutions. This may necessitate the creation of a specialized trust structure designed to process victim claims and try to satisfy them above and beyond what they may have received from their insurance companies, or other funds, which often are insufficient to compensate their losses due to the fires.
These trusts represent a recognition that traditional litigation pathways may be inadequate for addressing the scale and complexity of wildfire damages. When hundreds or thousands of claims must be processed, each with unique circumstances and varying degrees of loss, a systematic approach may become essential. These structures provide the framework and potentially faster resolution path for organized, equitable distribution of available funds while accounting for the diverse needs of affected parties who have suffered losses—both individuals whose homes and personal property were destroyed, and businesses that faced operational disruptions, property damage, or complete devastation. The primary objective of these resolution structures is straightforward: to help victims access claim funds as efficiently and fairly as possible, enabling them to rebuild their lives and livelihoods.
Building upon the rapid data gathering, fact finding groundwork and damage assessment undertaken in earlier phases, the resolution phase can rely heavily on the data and analysis that emerged from initial response efforts and, unfortunately, prior similar fires. Work from Phase 1 and Phase 2 form a foundation that supports trustees in their essential function of managing and settling claims. Without accurate, comprehensive damage assessments and thorough documentation of losses, the entire resolution process may become significantly more challenging and potentially inequitable. That is not to say that without damages measurement on a large case a trust cannot set up mechanism to compensate victims, but that these inputs can provide the necessary data and methods to efficiently evaluate claims that are specific to a particular fire.
The data collected during initial phases serves multiple purposes in the resolution context. It provides baseline information for claim evaluation, establishes parameters for compensation calculations, and can offer trustees the detailed evidence necessary to make informed decisions about individual claims. This foundation ensures that the resolution process maintains both efficiency and fairness, two objectives that can sometimes appear to be in tension but are equally essential for successful outcomes.
Leverageable and Flexible Comprehensive Support Services
The complexity of wildfire claims resolution demands a multifaceted approach that addresses the needs of various stakeholders throughout the process. As discussed in earlier parts of this series, on-the-ground, local experts provide critical insights into each unique community that the disaster has impacted. Professional support services typically encompass three core areas, each requiring specialized expertise and tailored methodologies.
First, support for trustees and claims administrators represents a critical component of the resolution framework. These decision-makers face the challenging task of evaluating potentially thousands of claims while ensuring consistent application of compensation criteria and maintaining the integrity of the trust structure. This includes assistance with claim evaluation methodologies, development of compensation frameworks, and ongoing consultation to address complex cases that fall outside standard parameters. This support helps trustees navigate the technical complexities of damage assessment while maintaining the transparency and accountability essential for public trust in the resolution process.
Second, direct support for victims—both individuals and businesses—addresses the practical challenges faced by those seeking compensation through the trust structure. Many claimants/victims lack experience with formal claim processes and access to information and may struggle to properly document their losses or understand the requirements for successful claim submission. Legal and other professional support services help victims assemble comprehensive claims packages, accurately assess the full scope of their losses, and navigate the procedural requirements of the trust system. This assistance proves particularly valuable for complex business claims, as no two businesses are entirely the same. Operational losses and business interruption damages often require more sophisticated analysis to quantify accurately.
Third, evaluation of private party damages extends the application of specialized expertise beyond trust resolution to address disputes in other contexts, such as insurance claims or direct litigation between parties. This broader application recognizes that not all wildfire-related disputes are resolved through trust structures, and that the same analytical rigor and technical expertise valuable in trust contexts can significantly benefit other resolution pathways, including mediation, litigation, and other dispute resolution mechanisms.
Tailored Solutions for Complex Circumstances
Successful wildfire claim resolution requires recognition that no two disasters are identical and that each municipality or community has its own defining characteristics, and therefore no standardized, one-size-fits-all approach can adequately address the unique circumstances of each event. Professional support services must be highly adaptable, building upon the investigative and assessment work completed in earlier phases while remaining flexible enough to address the specific characteristics of each situation.
This integrated and customized approach serves multiple stakeholders by helping all parties develop realistic expectations about potential outcomes. For trustees, this means having access to sophisticated modeling tools that can project various scenarios and their implications for fund distribution. For fire victims, it provides clarity about the likely range of compensation and the factors that influence final awards. For other stakeholders, including insurance companies and defendants, it offers insight into the parameters that will guide resolution discussions and negotiations.
The customization can extend to the tools, methodologies, and processes employed in the resolution process. While fundamental principles of damage assessment and claim evaluation remain consistent, their application must account for the specific circumstances of each wildfire event. Factors such as the geographic scope of damage, the types of properties affected, local construction costs, and regional economic conditions all influence how resolution services are designed and implemented.
Broader Applications and Stakeholder Considerations
The expertise built from an understanding of the lifecycle from the time of a fire event through wildfire claim resolution has applications to various types of dispute configurations and to various stakeholders. This experience and expertise also prove valuable in conflicts involving:
- victims seeking compensation,
- defendants facing potential liability, and
- insurance companies managing their exposure and obligations.
The analytical frameworks and technical capabilities that support trust resolution can be adapted to address claims in traditional litigation contexts, regulatory proceedings, and alternative dispute resolution processes.
Insurance coverage disputes, subrogation claims, business interruption analyses, and property valuation challenges all benefit from the same rigorous, evidence-based approach that characterizes effective trust resolution. Professional support services must be designed to address this interconnected landscape of claims and disputes, recognizing that resolution in one context often influences or overlaps with outcomes in others.
Additionally, the resolution phase often reveals standalone complexities that require specialized attention. Construction delays during the recovery process, for example, can significantly impact both the cost and timeline of rebuilding efforts. These challenges demand expertise that goes beyond traditional damage assessment to encompass project management, construction economics, and logistical coordination. A holistic approach to claims resolution incorporates this broader range of expertise, ensuring that victims receive support that addresses the full spectrum of challenges they face in rebuilding.
The Value of Expert Guidance in Uncertain Times
The aftermath of a major wildfire creates an environment characterized by uncertainty, complexity, and high stakes for all involved parties. In this context, forensic experts provide essential value by bringing analytical rigor and systematic methodology to what might otherwise appear to be an overwhelming and chaotic situation. Their early involvement in the resolution process can significantly improve claim positioning for all stakeholders, ensuring that critical evidence is preserved, damages are accurately quantified, and resolution strategies are based on sound technical analysis.
Perhaps most approaches help shape recovery outcomes regardless of how legal and regulatory uncertainties ultimately resolve. While the specific mechanisms for compensation may evolve as legal proceedings progress, the underlying technical work of damage assessment and loss quantification provides a stable foundation for whatever resolution framework ultimately emerges. This preparation ensures that parties are positioned to move forward with confidence in the fairness and accuracy of the resolution process.
The path from wildfire devastation to community recovery is rarely straightforward, but with the right expertise and systematic approach, it becomes navigable. Through comprehensive support services tailored to the unique circumstances of each event, the resolution phase can fulfill its essential purpose: helping communities rebuild while ensuring that those who suffered losses receive fair and timely compensation.
If you have any questions or would like to discuss this topic please reach out to Xavier Oustalniol, Kristofer Buchan or Kimberly Ratto.
To receive StoneTurn Insights, sign up for our newsletter.
