With federal contracting officers, inspectors, and auditors furloughed, the systems that provide direction and ensure accountability vanish. And in that silence, even well-intentioned decisions can become liabilities.

The Temptation to Keep Moving

Contractors and state agencies alike are often caught between operational urgency and regulatory uncertainty. Projects are time-sensitive, crews are mobilized, and delays can be costly. In the absence of federal direction, many feel compelled to press forward. But without documented authority—such as written confirmation of funding or scope—this work may violate the terms of agreements and statutes, risk non-payment, and trigger post-shutdown audits.

This tension is especially acute in construction, where weather windows, subcontractor schedules, and material deliveries are tightly choreographed. A pause can ripple across the entire project timeline. Yet, the instinct to “do the right thing” and keep teams working can backfire if the work isn’t explicitly authorized.

Ripple Effects for State and Local Agencies

Shutdowns don’t just affect federal contractors—they also impact state and local agencies administering federally funded projects. These entities often rely on federal personnel for approvals, reimbursements, and compliance guidance. When those federal counterparts are unavailable:

• Project Delays Multiply: State-managed construction projects stall or risk future delays due to frozen federal approvals and inaccessible contracting officers.
• Funding Uncertainty: Agencies may hesitate to authorize payments or continue work without federal confirmation, risking budget overruns or halted progress.
• Audit Exposure: State and local agencies become vulnerable to post-shutdown audits if they allowed work to proceed without documented federal authority or failed to maintain proper records during the lapse.
• Compliance Confusion: Without federal guidance, agencies may misinterpret wage laws, procurement rules, or reporting requirements—especially on projects governed by the Davis-Bacon Act or other federal statutes.

How Contractors and Agencies Can Protect Themselves

To reduce risk during a shutdown, both contractors and state/local agencies should adopt proactive strategies:

For Contractors:

• Pause Without Written Authority: Do not proceed with work unless funding and scope are confirmed in writing.
• Maintain Detailed Records: Document all communications, decisions, and disruptions during the shutdown period.
• Conduct Internal Reviews: Audit billing, payroll, and procurement activity to identify and correct vulnerabilities before federal oversight resumes.
• Train Project Teams: Ensure field staff understand shutdown protocols and escalation procedures.

For State and Local Agencies:

• Establish Contingency Protocols: Develop internal procedures for managing federally funded projects during shutdowns, including when to pause work.
• Clarify Roles and Responsibilities: Designate points of contact for shutdown-related decisions and documentation.
• Determine Pre-Approval Where Possible: Ensure there is written guidance or authorizations were provided from federal partners before the shutdown.
• Monitor Compliance Closely: Pay special attention to wage laws, procurement rules, and reporting obligations that may be misapplied without federal input.

Conclusion

Shutdowns put organizational operations and ongoing projects to the test.

The absence of federal direction and approval creates a high-risk environment where even well-intentioned decisions can lead to audit findings, financial losses, mandated repayments, and reputational harm. Contractors and state/local agencies that prepare in advance, document rigorously, and pause when in doubt will be best positioned to weather this shutdown—and the scrutiny that follows.

—
If you have any questions or would like to discuss this topic please reach out to Paul Ryan.

To receive StoneTurn Insights, sign up for our newsletter.