Government-imposed corporate monitors—once a rare occurrence in the U.S.—are now commonplace, not only with domestic regulators but also with regulatory agencies in various other countries, in connection with enforcement proceedings and prosecutions for criminal offenses such as anti-corruption violations and other misconduct.

Posted In:

Even though government imposed monitors help organizations restore trust, recover from past misdeeds, and help prevent future legal and reputational damage no company volunteers for a government-appointed monitor.

In a recent article for New York Law Journal, Jonny Frank and Simon Platt outline steps companies can take to avoid or narrow the scope of a government-imposed monitor.

Read the full article.

About the Authors

Jonny Frank StoneTurn

Jonny Frank

Jonny Frank brings over 40 years of public and private sector and law and business school teaching experience in forensic investigations, compliance, and risk management. He helps organizations and counsel […]

Read Bio
Simon Platt

Simon Platt

Simon Platt co-founded StoneTurn in 2004 and is Co-Chair of the firm. He previously served as the firm’s Managing Partner until 2016, when he was appointed Chair and in 2022, […]

Read Bio